A few days ago, 61 academicians called for the industrialization of genetically modified rice, raising concerns about the safety of GM foods. According to a report from the Ministry of Agriculture, they plan to increase public education on genetic modification, foster a supportive public opinion environment for biotech applications in China, and speed up the revision of laws related to GMOs. On the 21st, Professor Huang Kunlun from the College of Food Science and Nutritional Engineering at China Agricultural University announced that the pig feeding test for BT gene-resistant rice had been completed. The results showed that transgenic BT rice is nutritionally and safely equivalent to non-transgenic rice. Pigs have digestive systems very similar to humans, making them ideal subjects for testing the safety of genetically modified crops. According to media reports, the Ministry of Agriculture commissioned a 90-day feeding trial of genetically modified rice on miniature pigs at China Agricultural University. Professor Huang Kunlun, a leading expert on GM rice, explained via email that the experiment aimed to evaluate the effects of BT rice on pigs. He emphasized that pigs are an excellent model for studying human digestion due to their similar gastrointestinal tract and omnivorous diet. The pigs involved in the study showed no signs of poisoning or death during the 90-day period. They had smooth fur, normal movement, healthy appetites, and good growth. However, despite these findings, public skepticism remains high. Many people question whether such short-term tests can truly reflect long-term health impacts. Critics argue that 90 days is only a fraction of a pig’s lifespan, which would be equivalent to just a few months in a human's life. This raises doubts about whether such studies can effectively assess potential toxicity over time. Currently, China has approved safety certificates for genetically modified crops like cotton, rice, corn, and papaya, but commercial planting is still pending. Under the Seed Law, GM crops require additional certifications before they can be commercially cultivated. So far, only cotton and papaya are officially planted, while GM rice and corn remain unapproved. Additionally, several imported crops, including soybeans, corn, rapeseed, and sugar beet, are genetically modified and must pass China’s safety standards before being used in processing. Despite this, many consumers remain skeptical about the safety of GM foods. Recent online surveys show that 89% of participants believe GM foods are unsafe, and 94% oppose their commercialization in China. This reflects a growing public concern that is not purely scientific, but rather rooted in a lack of trust in institutions and transparency. In 2004, the U.S. National Academy of Sciences warned that GM crops could pose risks to both human health and the environment. In 2009, the American Academy of Environmental Medicine reported potential health risks, including infertility, immune issues, and organ damage in animals fed GM foods. These findings led to calls for doctors to advise patients against consuming genetically modified products. Some experts, including 61 Chinese academicians, have pushed for faster industrialization of GM rice, arguing that delays hinder scientific progress. However, critics suggest their motivations may be more aligned with research funding and economic interests than public health. According to ISAAA data, the top five countries growing GM crops are the U.S., Brazil, Argentina, Canada, and India. None of these countries have yet commercialized GM rice or wheat. As the debate continues, the long-term impact of GM foods on public health and the environment remains a critical concern for many.

Industrial Online PH Electrode

Description

Industrial pH Probe,Industrial pH Sensor,industrial ph electrode

Suzhou Delfino Environmental Technology Co., Ltd. , https://www.daruifuno.com